1
logo
  • 专业案例
    • 商标案件
    • 专利案件
    • 著作权案件
    • 反不正当竞争案件
  • 专业人员
  • 新闻动态
  • 集佳论丛
  • 关于我们
    • 集佳介绍
    • 荣誉概览
  • 联系我们
  • 中文
    • EN
>雷速 (中国)官方网站-足球篮球直播平台>关于我们>荣誉概览>2025>中共雷速 (中国)官方网站-足球篮球直播平台联合支部委员会获评北京市“先进律师事务所党组织”光荣称号 多位优秀党员获得表彰

要我帮你核对,还是想润色成文案?

发布时间:2025-07-01

Verifying a statement

I need to respond to the user regarding their statement in Chinese about Liverpool conceding 4+ goals at home in the Champions League. They mention that this has happened for the second time, the last being in February 2023 against Real Madrid. I’ll confirm the accuracy of this statement and provide context, mentioning the specific match on February 21, 2023. I’m also recalling past heavy defeats at Anfield in the Champions League. Let's make sure everything is correct!Clarifying Liverpool's match history

I’m analyzing Liverpool's performance in the Champions League at Anfield to confirm if they conceded 4+ goals at home multiple times. The famous 4-4 against Chelsea was the second leg, but they only conceded 3 in the first leg. I remember 2014 vs. Real Madrid when they lost 0-3. Overall, aside from the recent 5 conceded in 2023 against Real Madrid, it seems Liverpool hasn’t had many instances of 4+ goals conceded at home in the UCL. I need to verify if there are any other matches that fit this criteria.Analyzing Champions League history

决赛首回合\n

I’m looking into the claim about Liverpool conceding 4+ goals at Anfield in the Champions League. The user mentioned [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;second time[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; after the 2023 match against Real Madrid where they conceded 5. I recall the history, but the Champions League began in 1992, and older records may not apply. I've seen Liverpool's other results: 2014 vs. Real Madrid (0-3), and in 2019 against Salzburg (4-3). I need to clarify if there’s another instance of 4 goals conceded at home.Clarifying and rephrasing

I’m checking Liverpool's history regarding conceding 4+ goals at home in the Champions League. It looks like the only instance is indeed the 2-5 loss to Real Madrid in 2023. I wonder what match the user is referring to as the [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;second time.[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; They might want a polished phrasing for their statement in Chinese. I could suggest a caption like, [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;这是利物浦在欧冠主场历史上第二次单场失4+球,[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; and offer to mention that they've never conceded 4+ before, except for that Real Madrid match. I should also ask if they want me to refine that further.Refining the user's statement

The user's message is a statement, so I should first clarify what they need. I can ask: [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;需要我润色成一句更顺的文案,还是帮你核对数据?[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; I want to provide a polished version and a couple of alternatives. I should be precise about terminology like [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;欧冠[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; versus [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;欧冠时代.[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; Liverpool's previous heavy defeats don't fit the 4+ goals criterion. I'll present three polished phrasings:

  1. 利物浦欧冠主场史上仅第二次单场丢4球及以上,上一次为2023年主场2-5不敌皇马。
  2. 这是利物浦欧冠主场第2次被对手攻入4+球;上一次发生在2023年,2-5皇马。
  3. 安菲尔德欧冠仅第2次单场失4+球,上一次是2023年2-5皇马。

If they want more detail, I can add the round specifics, but it might be best to keep it straightforward.

要我帮你核对,还是想润色成文案?

利物\n

可用的简洁说法:

  • 利物浦欧冠主场史上仅第二次单场丢4球及以上,上一次是2023年主场2-5不敌皇马。
  • 这是利物浦在欧冠主场第2次被攻入4+球;上一次发生在2023年,对手皇马,比分2-5。
  • 安菲尔德欧冠仅第2次单场失4+球,上一次为2023年2-5皇马(1/8决赛首回合)。
  • 及以\n

浏览次数: 返回
  • 前一则: 集佳代理华为牢牢守住首发正品的市场防线和市场份额 入选南京法院护航首发经济高质量发展典型案例
  • 后一则: 雷速 (中国)官方网站-足球篮球直播平台上海分所获选设立上海市首家知识产权海外公共服务站

站在客户的角度考虑每一个问题,
全身心地关注客户的每一个细节

机构代码:16095

广西壮族自治区 南岗区 解放路65号

电话:18200028754

传真:(8610)59208730

E-mail:contact@leisu-online-zh.com

雷速 (中国)官方网站-足球篮球直播平台

Copyright 2007,Unitalen Attorneys at Law 版权所有 雷速 (中国)官方网站-足球篮球直播平台 京ICP备10009131号